My question, and confusion, is caused by the contradictions of the multiple definitions. In fact, in stories where the flat arc belongs the MC, they are often representative of an idea, yet whilst also being three-dimensional, naturally. This feature however, only requires their arc being flat. However, he also said that a flat character represents an idea, by being unchanging, almost like a force of nature. Forster said a flat character is someone who is both two-dimensional and has a flat character arc. That means that according to Britannica, E.
I forgot to mention these further confuddling details. Other times, I hear flat character explained as a character that has a flat arc, but one that's not necessarily two-dimensional.įrom this Britannica definition, who defines the term in the first way, I suspect that maybe this is a case of these terms originally being well-defined, but after misuse, are now ambiguous? However, sometimes, I hear two-dimensional character explained flat character. Here, a two-dimensional character is character that shows a little, and not very complex, emotions and/or traits. The way I understand it, the term flat character is used for a character that is both two-dimensional and has a flat character arc.
0 kommentar(er)
